This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by COHN, D. A. Articles by PEARSON, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Working Models of Childhood Attachment and Couple Relationships

University of Virginia

DANIEL H. SILVER

University of California, Berkeley

CAROLYN P. COWAN

University of California, Berkeley

PHILIP A. COWAN

University of California, Berkeley

JANE PEARSON

National Institute of Mental Health

Previous research has documented connections between adults' working models of childhood attachment relationships and the quality of parent-child relationships, but less attention has been devoted to examining such links for intimate adult relationships. Twenty-seven married couples were given George, Kaplan, and Main's Adult Attachment Interview and each person was rated as either secure or insecure with respect to attachment. Self-report measures of satisfaction with couple communication and marital relations and laboratory observations of couple interactions were collected. Results showed that self-reported marital satisfaction was not related to adult attachment classifications for either husbands or wives. However, observational ratings of couple interaction yielded differences for husbands. As compared to husbands classified as insecure, secure husbands were likely to be in better-functioning couples who engaged in more positive and fewer conflictual behaviors. In addition, couples' joint attachment classifications were related to observed couple behavior. Insecure-secure and secure-secure dyads did not differ, but both groups showed less conflict and were rated as better functioning than were insecure-insecure dyads. These findings suggest that a secure partner may buffer the negative effects of insecure attachment on the marital relationship.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 13, No. 4, 432-449 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/019251392013004003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z.-y. Chen, R. X. Liu, and H. B. Kaplan Mediating Mechanisms for the Intergenerational Transmission of Constructive Parenting: A Prospective Longitudinal Study Journal of Family Issues, December 1, 2008; 29(12): 1574 - 1599. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Black and E. D. Schutte Recollections of Being Loved: Implications of Childhood Experiences With Parents for Young Adults' Romantic Relationships Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 1459 - 1480. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Hayslett-Mccall and T. J. Bernard Attachment, masculinity, and self-control: A theory of male crime rates Theoretical Criminology, February 1, 2002; 6(1): 5 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Dickstein, R. Seifer, M. St Andre, and M. Schiller Marital Attachment Interview: Adult Attachment Assessment of Marriage Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2001; 18(5): 651 - 672. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. O'HEARN and K. E. DAVIS Women's Experience of Giving and Receiving Emotional Abuse: An Attachment Perspective J Interpers Violence, June 1, 1997; 12(3): 375 - 391. [Abstract]

				M. A. Whisman and L. E. Allan Attachment and Social Cognition Theories of Romantic Relationships: Convergent or Complementary Perspectives? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, May 1, 1996; 13(2): 263 - 278. [Abstract]

				P. Giblin Attachment: A Concept That Connects The Family Journal, October 1, 1994; 2(4): 349 - 353. [Abstract]