Journal of Family Issues

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LICHTER, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by HAYWARD, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 16, No. 4, 412-431 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/019251395016004001

Marriage Markets and Marital Choice

DANIEL T. LICHTER

Pennsylvania State University

ROBERT N. ANDERSON

Pennsylvania State University

MARK D. HAYWARD

Pennsylvania State University

This article presents a search model of marital choice. We tested the hypothesis that demographic shortages of suitable marital partners not only lower the probability of marriage, but increase the likelihood that never-married women will either: (a) marry men with characteristics dissimilar to their own or (b) marry men with low socioeconomic status. This analysis was accomplished using data from the 1979-1986 waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, merged with various local-area sex ratios from the 1980 decennial U.S. Census. We found that a favorable marriage market, measured in terms of the relative number of men to women, increases the odds of marrying a high-status man compared with a low-status man (as measured in terms of education and occupation). It also increases the chance of forgoing marriage rather than marrying low-status men. At the same time, we found little evidence that mate surpluses or deficits in the local marriage market affect patterns of homogamy or assortative mating. The implication is that market conditions— good or bad—have little to do with women's willingness to marry heterogamously. Women are unwilling to "cast a wider net" in the face of market constraints.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. M. Montoya
I'm Hot, So I'd Say You're Not: The Influence of Objective Physical Attractiveness on Mate Selection
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2008; 34(10): 1315 - 1331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. Nemoto
Postponed Marriage: Exploring Women's Views of Matrimony and Work in Japan
Gender Society, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 219 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
Deborah Roempke Graefe and D. T. Lichter
When Unwed Mothers Marry: The Marital and Cohabiting Partners of Midlife Women
Journal of Family Issues, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 595 - 622.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
R. K. Raley and J. Bratter
Not Even if You Were the Last Person on Earth!: How Marital Search Constraints Affect the Likelihood of Marriage
Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2004; 25(2): 167 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
D. L. BLACKWELL and D. T. LICHTER
Mate Selection Among Married and Cohabiting Couples
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2000; 21(3): 275 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
C. M. ALBRECHT, M. A. FOSSETT, C. M. CREADY, and K. J. KIECOLT
Mate Availability, Women's Marriage Prevalence, and Husbands' Education
Journal of Family Issues, July 1, 1997; 18(4): 429 - 452.
[Abstract]