Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHAPIRO, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Explaining Psychological Distress in a Sample of Remarried and Divorced Persons

The Influence of Economic Distress

ADAM D. SHAPIRO

University of Texas at Austin

This article analyzes a 1986 national survey (N = 2,081) to examine (a) whether there are differences in psychological distress and economic distress between remarried and divorced persons and (b) if differences in economic distress explain differences in psychological distress between remarried and divorced persons. Findings show that, compared to the currently divorced, the remarried have significantly lower rates of economic distress and psychological distress. Economic distress, particularly a subjective assessment, explains a large proportion of the marital status differences in psychological distress. The most profound influence of economic distress on psychological distress is found for divorced women.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 17, No. 2, 186-203 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/019251396017002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
A. Bierman, E. M. Fazio, and M. A. Milkie
A Multifaceted Approach to the Mental Health Advantage of the Married: Assessing How Explanations Vary by Outcome Measure and Unmarried Group
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 554 - 582.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
R. Walker, T. Logan, C. E. Jordan, and J. C. Campbell
An Integrative Review of Separation in the Context of Victimization: Consequences and Implications for Women
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2004; 5(2): 143 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
D. K. Anderson, D. G. Saunders, M. Yoshihama, D. I. Bybee, and C. M. Sullivan
Long-term Trends in Depression among Women Separated from Abusive Partners
Violence Against Women, July 1, 2003; 9(7): 807 - 838.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
D. K. Anderson and D. G. Saunders
Leaving An Abusive Partner: An Empirical Review of Predictors, the Process of Leaving, and Psychological Well-Being
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2003; 4(2): 163 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
K. D. RETTIG, R. D. LEICHTENTRITT, and L. M. STANTON
Understanding Noncustodial Fathers' Family and Life Satisfaction From Resource Theory Perspective
Journal of Family Issues, July 1, 1999; 20(4): 507 - 538.
[Abstract] [PDF]