This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by SANCHEZ, L. Articles by KANE, E. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Women's and Men's Constructions of Perceptions of Housework Fairness

Tulane University

EMILY W. KANE

University of Wisconsin—Madison

Much work on the perceived fairness of the division of housework focuses on what we consider pragmatic approaches (i.e., resources, time availability, and power), but nascent research articulates a more symbolic approach, examining relational meanings of house-work. We examine both perspectives simultaneously. Using the National Survey of Families and Households, we investigate how perceptions of housework fairness for men and women in heterosexual couples are affected by gender, time availability and the division of labor, individual resources and interdependence within the couple, gender and family attitudes, perceptions of the qualities of household labor, and partners' social interactions. Three critical findings suggest revisions for fairness perception studies. First, perceived housework qualities are as important for predicting fairness perceptions as any other factors. Second, perceived housework qualities are a stronger determinant of women's fairness perceptions than men's fairness perceptions. Third, social emotional independence within the couple also predicts perceived unfairness, but only for women. Women who perceive themselves as less dependent on their relationship are more likely to view the division of labor as unfair.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 17, No. 3, 358-387 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/019251396017003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Clarke, M. B. Heaton, C. L. Israelsen, and D. L. Eggett The Acquisition of Family Financial Roles and Responsibilities Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, June 1, 2005; 33(4): 321 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Sullivan Changing Gender Practices within the Household: A Theoretical Perspective Gender Society, April 1, 2004; 18(2): 207 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Dixon and M. Wetherell On Discourse and Dirty Nappies: Gender, the Division of Household Labour and the Social Psychology of Distributive Justice Theory Psychology, April 1, 2004; 14(2): 167 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Himsel and W. A. Goldberg Social Comparisons and Satisfaction with the Division of Housework: Implications for Men's and Women's Role Strain Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2003; 24(7): 843 - 866. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Nordenmark and C. Nyman Fair or Unfair? Perceived Fairness of Household Division of Labour and Gender Equality among Women and Men: The Swedish Case European Journal of Women's Studies, May 1, 2003; 10(2): 181 - 209. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. G. ELLISON and J. P. BARTKOWSKI Conservative Protestantism and the Division of Household Labor among Married Couples Journal of Family Issues, November 1, 2002; 23(8): 950 - 985. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. DOUCET "You See the Need Perhaps More Clearly Than I Have": Exploring Gendered Processes of Domestic Responsibility Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2001; 22(3): 328 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Baxter The Joys and Justice of Housework Sociology, November 1, 2000; 34(4): 609 - 631. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. T. GAGER The Role of Valued Outcomes, Justifications, and Comparison Referents in Perceptions of Fairness Among Dual-Earner Couples Journal of Family Issues, September 1, 1998; 19(5): 622 - 648. [Abstract]