Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Party Politics and Family Policy

The Case of the Family and Medical Leave Act

MICHELLE ROSE MARKS

The University of Akron

The Family and Medical Leave Act offers an excellent case study of a family policy that became embroiled in partisan conflict. The Democratic authors of the bill proposed an extensive leave period available to most workers. Arguing that the policy would pose hardships for businesses, Republicans severely diluted the original legislation, reducing the leave period and eliminating many workers from coverage. The resulting bill offered less support to working parents than leave policies in most other countries. The article opens with a description of problematic features of the bill that derive from partisan politics and then places the drafting of the bill in historical context. The story of the bill's passage is then discussed, highlighting the role of parties and interest groups, especially business organizations. The article concludes by providing a larger analysis of the leave debate.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 18, No. 1, 55-70 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/019251397018001004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
L. Nichols, C. Elman, and K. M. Feltey
The Economic Resource Receipt of New Mothers
Journal of Family Issues, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1305 - 1330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crit SociolHome page
E. Wysong and D. W. Wright
Family Friendly Workplace Benefits: The U.S., Canada, and Europe
Crit Sociol, May 1, 2003; 29(3): 337 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
N. GERSTEL and K. McGONAGLE
Job Leaves and the Limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act: The Effects of Gender, Race, and Family
Work and Occupations, November 1, 1999; 26(4): 510 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crit SociolHome page
D. W. Wright and E. Wysong
Family Friendly Workplace Benefits: Policy Mirage, Organizational Contexts, and Worker Power
Crit Sociol, January 1, 1998; 24(3): 244 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]