Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEATON, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by BLAKE, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gender Differences in Determinants of Marital Disruption

TIM B. HEATON

Brigham Young University

ASHLEY M. BLAKE

Brigham Young University

Because the family is a highly gendered institution, the authors anticipated that characteristics of husbands and wives would have differing influences on marital disruption. Longitudinal data from the National Survey of Families and Households were used to examine the influence of sociodemographic and attitudinal characteristics of each spouse on the likelihood of marital disruption. In general, wives' variables have a stronger influence than do husbands' variables, suggesting that wives play a greater role in maintenance of marital relationships and are more sensitive to problems in the relationship. The relative influence of each spouse's characteristics is more similar in egalitarian marriages, however. Findings confirm the gendered nature of marital relationships.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 20, No. 1, 25-45 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/019251399020001002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
B. Hewitt, J. Baxter, and M. Western
Marriage breakdown in Australia: The social correlates of separation and divorce
Journal of Sociology, June 1, 2005; 41(2): 163 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
S. N. Davis and T. N. Greenstein
Interactive Effects of Gender Ideology and Age at First Marriage on Women's Marital Disruption
Journal of Family Issues, July 1, 2004; 25(5): 658 - 682.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
L. R. Hatch and K. Bulcroft
Does Long-Term Marriage Bring Less Frequent Disagreements?: Five Explanatory Frameworks
Journal of Family Issues, May 1, 2004; 25(4): 465 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black StudiesHome page
M. Ivy, V. Newsome, and O. Aroyewun
Determinants of Transit from Marriage among African Americans
Journal of Black Studies, March 1, 2004; 34(4): 532 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
M. M. SWEENEY
Remarriage and the Nature of Divorce: Does it Matter Which Spouse Chose to Leave?
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2002; 23(3): 410 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]