Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AMATO, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by ROGERS, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Do Attitudes Toward Divorce Affect Marital Quality?

PAUL R. AMATO

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

STACY J. ROGERS

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Exchange theory predicts that people who adopt favorable attitudes toward divorce invest fewer resources in their marriages, thus eroding marital quality. Cognitive dissonance theory predicts that people who experience declines in marital quality adopt more favorable attitudes toward divorce as they anticipate leaving the relationship. This study tests both hypotheses. National, longitudinal data and structural equation models are used to estimate reciprocal paths between changes in attitudes toward divorce and changes in marital quality. The data provide stronger support for the exchange theory hypothesis than the cognitive dissonance hypothesis. Adopting more favorable attitudes toward divorce appears to undermine marital quality in the long run.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 20, No. 1, 69-86 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/019251399020001004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
M. C. Van Epp, T. G. Futris, J. C. Van Epp, and K. Campbell
The Impact of the PICK a Partner Relationship Education Program on Single Army Soldiers
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, June 1, 2008; 36(4): 328 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
S. S. Hall
Marital Meaning: Exploring Young Adults' Belief Systems About Marriage
Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 1437 - 1458.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
C.-c. Yi and W.-y. Chien
Does Conjugal Disparity Affect Marital Relations?: A Comparative Study of Taiwan, Shanghai and Hong Kong
Current Sociology, March 1, 2006; 54(2): 229 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
C. A. Kapinus
The Effect of Parents' Attitudes toward Divorce on Offspring's Attitudes: Gender and Parental Divorce as Mediating Factors
Journal of Family Issues, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 112 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
S. F. Duncan and M. M. Wood
Perceptions of Marriage Preparation among College-Educated Young Adults with Greater Family-Related Risks for Marital Disruption
The Family Journal, October 1, 2003; 11(4): 342 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]