Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KNOESTER, C.
Right arrow Articles by BOOTH, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Barriers to Divorce

When Are They Effective? When Are They Not?

CHRIS KNOESTER

Pennsylvania State University

ALAN BOOTH

Pennsylvania State University

This study explores the perceived importance of eight barriers to divorce, their correlation with objective circumstances, and the effectiveness of both perceived barriers and objective indicators of barriers as predictors of subsequent divorce. The findings indicate that married individuals perceive a variety of barriers to be very important to keeping one's marriage intact. However, perceived barriers do not correlate substantially with objective circumstances nor are they very effective in deterring subsequent divorce—especially after accounting for respondents' divorce proneness. Objective indicators have slightly stronger associations with subsequent divorce but do not weaken the conclusion that barriers are not very effective deterrents to divorce.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 21, No. 1, 78-99 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/019251300021001004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
S. F. Kahl, L. Carr Steelman, L. M. Mulkey, P. R. Koch, W. L. Dougan, and S. Catsambis
Revisiting Reuben Hill's Theory of Familial Response to Stressors: The Mediating Role of Mental Outlook for Offspring of Divorce
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, September 1, 2007; 36(1): 5 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Family IssuesHome page
R. Schoen, S. J. Rogers, and P. R. Amato
Wives' Employment and Spouses' Marital Happiness: Assessing the Direction of Influence Using Longitudinal Couple Data
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 506 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
R. Walker, T. Logan, C. E. Jordan, and J. C. Campbell
An Integrative Review of Separation in the Context of Victimization: Consequences and Implications for Women
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2004; 5(2): 143 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]