Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OSWALD, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Who am I in Relation to Them?

Gay, Lesbian, and Queer People Leave the City to Attend Rural Family Weddings

RAMONA FAITH OSWALD

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Nine gay, lesbian, and queer adults who were raised in rural areas but now live in the city returned to their families and communities of origin to attend family weddings. The shift from urban to rural, nonfamily to family, everyday to ritual, was a shift by which they renegotiated their sense of self as different from their families and communities of origin. What it meant to be gay, lesbian, or queer (GLQ) depended upon specific interaction contexts. The negotiation of being different as GLQ occurred within dialectics of visibility/invisibility, closeness/distance, and comfort/discomfort during weddings. Results presented here emerged as significant within a larger study of heterosexism and family ritual. Data were collected in focus group interviews and analyzed inductively using a combination of family discourse and grounded theory methods.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 23, No. 3, 323-348 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0192513X02023003001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
J. Lee, M. J. Katras, and J. W. Bauer
Children's Birthday Celebrations From the Lived Experiences of Low-Income Rural Mothers
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2009; 30(4): 532 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
A. M. Humble, A. M. Zvonkovic, and A. J. Walker
"The Royal We": Gender Ideology, Display, and Assessment in Wedding Work
Journal of Family Issues, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 3 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
E. A. Suter, K. L. Daas, and K. M. Bergen
Negotiating Lesbian Family Identity via Symbols and Rituals
Journal of Family Issues, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 26 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
R. F. Oswald and E. A. Suter
Heterosexist Inclusion and Exclusion during Ritual: A "Straight Versus Gay" Comparison
Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2004; 25(7): 881 - 889.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
K. Liddle and B. J. Liddle
VI. in the Meantime: Same-Sex Ceremonies in the Absence of Legal Recognition
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 2004; 14(1): 52 - 56.
[PDF]