Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CURTIS, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by ELLISON, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Religious Heterogamy and Marital Conflict

Findings From the National Survey of Families and Households

KRISTEN TAYLOR CURTIS

University of Texas at Austin

CHRISTOPHER G. ELLISON

University of Texas at Austin

This study addresses two questions: Do religiously dissimilar couples argue more often than other couples? Are religious differences among partners associated with arguments concerning particular issues? We investigate these issues using data on 2,945 co-residing, first-time married couples from Wave 1 of the National Survey of Families and Households. Denominational homo/heterogamy, measured in several different ways, has little bearing on the frequency or types of marital disagreements. Men's religious attendance is inversely related to the overall frequency of disputes and to disagreements over housework, money, how time is spent, and sex, whereas women's attendance is not. Attendance (dis)similarities among partners are positively associated with the overall frequency of conflicts. Theological disparities between partners are linked with more frequent conflicts overall and also with disagreements over household labor and finances. Several implications and promising directions for future research are discussed.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 23, No. 4, 551-576 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0192513X02023004005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
R. J. Taylor, L. M. Chatters, K. McKeever Bullard, J. M. Wallace Jr, and J. S. Jackson
Organizational Religious Behavior Among Older African Americans: Findings From the National Survey of American Life
Research on Aging, July 1, 2009; 31(4): 440 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
D. M. Gibson
Relationship Betrayal and the Influence of Religious Beliefs: A Case Illustration of Couples Counseling
The Family Journal, October 1, 2008; 16(4): 344 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
N. M. Lambert and D. C. Dollahite
The Threefold Cord: Marital Commitment in Religious Couples
Journal of Family Issues, May 1, 2008; 29(5): 592 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
J. E. Grable, S. Britt, and J. Cantrell
An Exploratory Study of the Role Financial Satisfaction Has on the Thought of Subsequent Divorce
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, December 1, 2007; 36(2): 130 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
A. M. Burdette, C. G. Ellison, D. E. Sherkat, and K. A. Gore
Are There Religious Variations in Marital Infidelity?
Journal of Family Issues, December 1, 2007; 28(12): 1553 - 1581.
[Abstract] [PDF]