Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gager, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Two as One?

Couples’ Perceptions of Time Spent Together, Marital Quality, and the Risk of Divorce

Constance T. Gager, ,

University of Pennsylvania

Laura Sanchez, ,

Bowling Green State University

This article employs event-history analysis of couple-level data from two waves of the National Survey of Families and Households to examine the effects of spouses’ perceptions of shared time and marital quality and stability on subsequent odds of marital dissolution. Of central importance in the analysis is the role that gender plays, because empirical evidence documents significant gender variation in spouses’ expectations, perceptions, and experience of marriage. When husbands provide the more negative evaluations of marital quality, the couple are more likely to dissolve their marriage; but when more concrete, proximate measures of marital stability are considered, wives’ more negative reports are better predictors of subsequent divorce. The analysis provides a contribution to divorce research by modeling the effects of couple-level, social-psychological dynamics and by highlighting the importance of recognizing the multiple, often conflicting realities of the emotional content of marriage.

Key Words:

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 24, No. 1, 21-50 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0192513X02238519


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
B. E. Hohmann-Marriott
Father Involvement Ideals and the Union Transitions of Unmarried Parents
Journal of Family Issues, July 1, 2009; 30(7): 898 - 920.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
A. DeMaris
The role of relationship inequity in marital disruption
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 2007; 24(2): 177 - 195.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
R. Schoen, S. J. Rogers, and P. R. Amato
Wives' Employment and Spouses' Marital Happiness: Assessing the Direction of Influence Using Longitudinal Couple Data
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 506 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
C. Yodanis
Divorce Culture and Marital Gender Equality: A Cross-National Study
Gender Society, October 1, 2005; 19(5): 644 - 659.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
S. D. Stewart
Boundary Ambiguity in Stepfamilies
Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2005; 26(7): 1002 - 1029.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
K. M. Nomaguchi, M. A. Milkie, and S. M. Bianchi
Time Strains and Psychological Well-Being: Do Dual-Earner Mothers and Fathers Differ?
Journal of Family Issues, September 1, 2005; 26(6): 756 - 792.
[Abstract] [PDF]