Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frisco, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Perceived Housework Equity, Marital Happiness, and Divorce in Dual-Earner Households

Michelle L. Frisco

Iowa State University

Kristi Williams

The Ohio State University

This study uses a nationally representative sample of individuals involved in dual-earner marriages to examine the relationship between perceived fairness of housework completion, marital happiness, and divorce. The authors expected to find that perceived inequality in the division of housework causes tension between spouses that leads to decreased marital quality for both men and women. They further speculated that an unfair division of household labor might contribute to a greater likelihood of divorce. Results indicate that perceived inequity in the division of household labor is negatively associated with both husbands[#X2019] and wives[#X2019]reported marital happiness but is positively associated with the odds of divorce among wives only. Little evidence indicates that marital happiness mediates this relationship. The authors propose that unfair perceptions of the division of household labor not only decrease women[#X2019]s marital quality but also lead to role strain that makes them more likely to end unsatisfying marriages.

Key Words:

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 24, No. 1, 51-73 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0192513X02238520


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
J. M. Koivunen, J. W. Rothaupt, and S. M. Wolfgram
Gender Dynamics and Role Adjustment During the Transition to Parenthood: Current Perspectives
The Family Journal, October 1, 2009; 17(4): 323 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
M. Corra, S. K. Carter, J. S. Carter, and D. Knox
Trends in Marital Happiness by Gender and Race, 1973 to 2006
Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2009; 30(10): 1379 - 1404.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Career DevelopmentHome page
K. M. Perrone, S. L. Wright, and Z. V. Jackson
Traditional and Nontraditional Gender Roles and Work--Family Interface for Men and Women
Journal of Career Development, September 1, 2009; 36(1): 8 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
B. Judkins and L. Presser
Division of eco-friendly household labor and the marital relationship
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2008; 25(6): 923 - 941.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
L. E. Tower and M. G. Alkadry
The Social Costs of Career Success for Women
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2008; 28(2): 144 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
M. Evertsson and M. Nermo
Changing Resources and the Division of Housework: A Longitudinal Study of Swedish Couples
Eur. Sociol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 23(4): 455 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
K. L. Minnotte, D. Pedersen Stevens, M. C. Minnotte, and G. Kiger
Emotion-Work Performance Among Dual-Earner Couples: Testing Four Theoretical Perspectives
Journal of Family Issues, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 773 - 793.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
A. DeMaris
The role of relationship inequity in marital disruption
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 2007; 24(2): 177 - 195.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
S. M. Ogletree, J. B. Worthen, G. M. Turner, and V. Vickers
Developing an Attitudes Toward Housecleaning Scale: Gender Comparisons and Counseling Applications
The Family Journal, October 1, 2006; 14(4): 400 - 407.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
D. J. Weigel, K. K. Bennett, and D. S. Ballard-Reisch
Roles and Influence in Marriages: Both Spouses' Perceptions Contribute to Marital Commitment
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, September 1, 2006; 35(1): 74 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
C. Yodanis
Divorce Culture and Marital Gender Equality: A Cross-National Study
Gender Society, October 1, 2005; 19(5): 644 - 659.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social ScienceHome page
D. Umberson and K. Williams
Marital Quality, Health, and Aging: Gender Equity?
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., October 1, 2005; 60(suppl_Special_Issue_2): S109 - S113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
Y. G. Lee and V. Bhargava
Leisure Time: Do Married and Single Individuals Spend It Differently?
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, March 1, 2004; 32(3): 254 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]