Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keene, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Job Costs of Family Demands

Gender Differences in Negative Family-to-Work Spillover

Jennifer Reid Keene

University of Nevada-Las Vegas, jkeene{at}unlv.nevada.edu

John R. Reynolds

Florida State University

This article uses the 1992 National Study of the Changing Workforce to examine family and workplace factors contributing to gender differences in negative family-to-work spillover. We focus on spillover as manifested when family demands negatively affect job performance. Among married workers, women were twice as likely as men to report that family demands negatively affect their job performance. This finding is due, in part, to the fact that women made more adjustments to their workloads—such as refusing overtime or turning down assignments—for the sake of family. Ordered probit analysis suggests that job characteristics are more salient than family factors for predicting the likelihood that family demands will detract from job performance and for explaining the gender gap in negative family-to-work spillover. Working in a demanding job or having little job autonomy was associated with more negative family-to-work spillover regardless of gender, while greater scheduling flexibility mitigated the gender gap.

Key Words: family-to-work spillover • gender • job characteristics • dual-earner couples • job performance

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 26, No. 3, 275-299 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0192513X04270219


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
E. B. King
The effect of bias on the advancement of working mothers: Disentangling legitimate concerns from inaccurate stereotypes as predictors of advancement in academe
Human Relations, December 1, 2008; 61(12): 1677 - 1711.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
M. Elchardus and W. Smits
The vanishing flexible: ambition, self-realization and flexibility in the career perspectives of young Belgian adults
Work Employment Society, June 1, 2008; 22(2): 243 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
D. P. Stevens, K. L. Minnotte, S. E. Mannon, and G. Kiger
Examining the "Neglected Side of the Work-Family Interface": Antecedents of Positive and Negative Family-to-Work Spillover
Journal of Family Issues, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 242 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
P. Voydanoff
Work Demands and Work-to-Family and Family-to-Work Conflict: Direct and Indirect Relationships
Journal of Family Issues, September 1, 2005; 26(6): 707 - 726.
[Abstract] [PDF]