Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAVIS, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Childless and Single-Childed Women in Early Twentieth-Century America

NANCY J. DAVIS

DePauw University

Over the course of this century, there have been marked fluctuations in the extent of childlessness and single-child fertility. In this article, data from the 1960 U.S. Census are used to examine cohort trends in childlessness and single-child motherhood among women born in the years 1891-1925. A marked rise in low-parity fertility is found among women who reached prime reproductive ages during the 1930s; cohorts born prior to or after these women had much lower levels of childlessness and single-child fertility. This rise and fall in low-partiy fertility is examined in the light of theories that see its cause as due to changes in (1) demographic composition across cohorts, (2) health levels that affect fecundity and hence fertility, (3) normative prescriptions to bear children and countervailing norms, and (4) economic conditions that affect the degree to which women limit reproduction. A loglinear analysis of changes in the composition of cohorts in race, age at marriage, marital history, and education shows that sociodemographic changes do not explain the upturn in low-parity fertility. Through an analysis of health statistics and the medical literature, the theory that changing health levels are responsible for the rise and fall in low-parity fertility is rejected. The normative and economic theories are found to be most useful in explaining trends in low-parity fertility. It is argued that over the course of this century, an interaction between economic conditions and reproductive ideology has both necessitated women limiting their childbearing in times of economic depression and provided justification for this.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 3, No. 4, 431-458 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/019251382003004002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?