This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by BOOTH, A. Articles by EDWARDS, J. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Predicting Divorce and Permanent Separation

University of Nebraska—Lincoln

DAVID R. JOHNSON

University of Nebraska—Lincoln

LYNN K. WHITE

University of Nebraska—Lincoln

JOHN N. EDWARDS

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Using longitudinal interview data, we examine the predictive ability of a scale designed to predict divorce and permanent separation. We find that high scorers are nine times more likely to divorce than low scorers. Divorce rates for components of the scale indicate that dissolution is a process, becoming more likely as overt actions succeed attitudinal factors. Finally, discriminant analysis is used to test a model predicting the likelihood of individuals moving from instability to divorce. The results indicate that individuals are more apt to move on to divorce or permanent separation if alternative attractions are present, there are few barriers to divorce, or when the marriage retains fewer attractions. The results indicate that the marital instability index in conjunction with information on barriers and attractions provides the basis for a comprehensive model predicting divorce.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 6, No. 3, 331-346 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/019251385006003005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. K. Dush and P. R. Amato Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2005; 22(5): 607 - 627. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. T. Gager and L. Sanchez Two as One?: Couples' Perceptions of Time Spent Together, Marital Quality, and the Risk of Divorce Journal of Family Issues, January 1, 2003; 24(1): 21 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. C. SAYER and S. M. BIANCHI Women's Economic Independence and the Probability of Divorce: A Review and Reexamination Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2000; 21(7): 906 - 943. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. R. AMATO and S. J. ROGERS Do Attitudes Toward Divorce Affect Marital Quality? Journal of Family Issues, January 1, 1999; 20(1): 69 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. SOUTH Do You Need to Shop Around?: Age at Marriage, Spousal Alternatives, and Marital Dissolution Journal of Family Issues, July 1, 1995; 16(4): 432 - 449. [Abstract]

				A. BOOTH and J. N. EDWARDS Starting Over: Why Remarriages Are More Unstable Journal of Family Issues, June 1, 1992; 13(2): 179 - 194. [Abstract]

				P. R. AMATO and A. BOOTH The Consequences of Divorce for Attitudes Toward Divorce and Gender Roles Journal of Family Issues, September 1, 1991; 12(3): 306 - 322. [Abstract]

				A. BOOTH and D. JOHNSON Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Success Journal of Family Issues, June 1, 1988; 9(2): 255 - 272. [Abstract]

				A. BOOTH, D. R. JOHNSON, L. K. WHITE, and J. N. EDWARDS Divorce and Marital Instability over the Life Course Journal of Family Issues, December 1, 1986; 7(4): 421 - 442. [Abstract]