Journal of Family Issues

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here for free online access to SAGE Family Studies journals

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GUBMAN, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by TESSLER, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 8, No. 2, 226-245 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/019251387008002005
© 1987 SAGE Publications

The Impact of Mental Illness on Families

Concepts and Priorities

GAYLE D. GUBMAN

New Jersey Division of Mental Health & Hospitals

RICHARD C. TESSLER

Social and Demographic Research Institute, University of Massachusetts

Mental illness has far-reaching effects on other family members, as individuals and as members of a social system. While the study of the family impact of mental illness has been reported in the specialized mental health literature, it has not received much attention from sociologists. This article applies an illness behavior perspective to the study of family burden, reviews knowledge, and invites research by defining a number of issues, substantive and methodological, that need to be addressed. These include the definition and measurement of burden, diagnosis and course of illness, residence and kinship, social class, context, and coping, and the evaluation of social interventions designed to reduce burden and strengthen family supports. The article concludes with a discussion of family burden in terms of normative forces operating at the macro level.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
S. Rungreangkulkij and C. L. Gilliss
Conceptual Approaches to Studying Family Caregiving for Persons With Severe Mental Illness
Journal of Family Nursing, November 1, 2000; 6(4): 341 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
R. Pruchno and J. H. Patrick
Mothers and Fathers of Adults with Chronic Disabilities: Caregiving Appraisals and Well-Being
Research on Aging, September 1, 1999; 21(5): 682 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
D. H. Salda, A. M. Dassori, and A. L. Miller
When is Caregiving a Burden? Listening to Mexican American Women
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 1999; 21(3): 283 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]