This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by BLUMBERG, R. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Income Under Female Versus Male Control

Hypotheses from a Theory of Gender Stratification and Data from the Third World

University of California, San Diego

This article presents a summary of Blumberg's general theory of gender stratification, which emphasizes relative male/female control of economic resources as a main (although not sole) predictor of a broad array of gender stratification consequences. It also reviews evidence from numerous Third World countries that men and women spend income under their control differently—with women holding back less for themselves and spending more on child nutrition and family "basic human needs." Thus the data indicate that when women lose control of income, what is affected is not only their relative marital/familial power (and self-esteem) but also family well-being. Moreover, evidence is presented that planned Third World development projects that rely on female labor but don't provide women with a return to that labor also are likely to suffer: Women will attempt to reallocate their efforts to tasks yielding income under their own control. In Africa, where women raise most locally marketed/consumed food and usually have specific familial obligations that require them to have independently controlled income, the bypassing of women farmers and undercutting their returns may be an important—albeit unheralded—factor in the region's food crisis. In sum, the Third World data support both the theory of gender stratification and the "relative resources" approach to marital power, and point the way to broadening the U.S. marital/family power debate to include male/female spending patterns.

Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 9, No. 1, 51-84 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/019251388009001004


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Chonody and D. C. Siebert Gender Differences in Depression: A Theoretical Examination of Power Affilia, November 1, 2008; 23(4): 338 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Mannon Love in the Time of Neo-Liberalism: Gender, Work, and Power in a Costa Rican Marriage Gender Society, August 1, 2006; 20(4): 511 - 530. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. T. Kenney The Power of the Purse: Allocative Systems and Inequality in Couple Households Gender Society, June 1, 2006; 20(3): 354 - 381. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. N. Oparaocha Book Reviews : Carol J. Ireson, Field, Forest, and Family: Women's Work and Power in Rural Laos; Colorado: Westview Press; 1996; 312 pages; $60.00 (hc) Gender Technology and Development, July 1, 1998; 2(2): 300 - 315. [PDF]

				M. Palgi Women in the Changing Kibbutz Economy Economic and Industrial Democracy, February 1, 1994; 15(1): 55 - 73. [Abstract]

				R. L. BLUMBERG and M. T. COLEMAN A Theoretical Look at the Gender Balance of Power in the American Couple Journal of Family Issues, June 1, 1989; 10(2): 225 - 250. [Abstract]