This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0192513X08326327v1 30/3/371    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ball, J. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Intergenerational Transmission of Abuse of Incarcerated Fathers: A Study of the Measurement of Abuse

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jeremyball{at}boisestate.edu.

	Abstract

Research on the intergenerational transmission of abuse hypothesis often only examined the existence of abuse. The current study utilizes retrospective recalls of incarcerated male defendants (N = 414), using questions formulated from the modified Conflict Tactics Scales. Five logistic regression models are run, representing a different physical abuse measure, including incidence of physical abuse; severity of physical abuse; and three composite measures: total frequency, total severity, and total frequency/severity. Although social desirability is a limitation in any study relying on self-report data, the comparison of the chi-square values of each model may give indication that the simpler abuse measures ("incidence of physical abuse" and "severity of physical abuse") are more predictive of later abusive behaviors than the more complex, composite measures.

First published on November 15, 2008, doi:10.1177/0192513X08326327

Journal of Family Issues 2009;30:371.

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?